Skip to main content
CheckYourWater

PFAS Testing Results

Michigan

PFAS testing results for 319 water systems serving 6,884,322 residents.

Systems tested

319

13.8% had PFAS detections

Limits exceeded

7

2.2% of systems

Population affected

239K

served by systems over federal limits

Most common compound

11Cl-PF3OUdS

detected in 35 systems

Grade distribution

Every water system gets a letter grade based on how its worst detected PFAS compound compares to the federal Maximum Contaminant Level. Lower grades mean higher contamination.

A275 systems (86.2%)
B30 systems (9.4%)
C7 systems (2.2%)
D7 systems (2.2%)
F0 systems (0.0%)

How grades are calculated →

Communities exceeding federal limits

The water systems in Michigan where at least one PFAS compound exceeds the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level, sorted worst first.

System nameCityGradeWorst compoundTimes over limitPopulation
INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIPCLARKSTON
PFHxS2.8x12K
GLADSTONEGLADSTONE
PFOS2.5x4.6K
DUNDEEDUNDEE
PFOA2.1x5.4K
KALAMAZOOKALAMAZOO
PFOS1.4x193K
SPRING LAKE TOWNSHIPSPRING LAKE
PFOA1.2x9.4K
GRAND HAVENGRAND HAVEN
PFOA1.2x10K
FREMONTFREMONT
PFOA1.1x4.5K

Resources for taking action are available in our community toolkit.

What Michigan is doing about PFAS

Michigan has one of the most developed state-level PFAS programs in the country. Governor Rick Snyder created the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team in 2017, and Governor Gretchen Whitmer continued and expanded the program. MPART coordinates PFAS work across the state environmental, health, agricultural, and military affairs departments.

In 2020 Michigan adopted enforceable drinking water MCLs for seven PFAS compounds through the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. The Michigan MCLs are 8 parts per trillion for PFOA, 16 parts per trillion for PFOS, 51 parts per trillion for PFHxS, 6 parts per trillion for PFNA, 420 parts per trillion for PFBS, 370 parts per trillion for HFPO-DA, and 400,000 parts per trillion for PFHxA. The PFOA and PFNA limits are stricter than the federal EPA MCLs finalized in April 2024, while the PFOS limit is weaker than the federal 4 parts per trillion.

State records show Michigan has required every community water supply in the state to sample for PFAS under the MCL rule, and results are posted to the Michigan PFAS dashboard. Communities that have exceeded limits include Parchment, where PFOS was detected at extreme levels in 2018, Oscoda near the former Wurtsmith Air Force Base, and Rockford downstream of the Wolverine Worldwide tannery.

The Michigan Attorney General has filed lawsuits against 3M, DuPont, Chemours, and other manufacturers seeking funding for cleanup and treatment. State records show Michigan has appropriated hundreds of millions of dollars for PFAS response through annual budgets. Public water systems are subject to both the Michigan MCLs and the federal compliance timeline requiring initial monitoring by 2027 and treatment installation by 2029.

Based on Michigan PFAS Action Response Team publications, Michigan Department of Environment Great Lakes and Energy records, and Michigan Attorney General filings.

All 319 tested water systems in Michigan

Sorted from lowest grade to highest. Click any system name for the full report. Filter by city or name with the search box below.

Showing 50 of 319 systems

GradeSystem nameCityWorst compoundvs. EPA limitPopulation
INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIPCLARKSTONPFHxS2.8× the federal limit12K
GLADSTONEGLADSTONEPFOS2.5× the federal limit4.6K
DUNDEEDUNDEEPFOA2.1× the federal limit5.4K
KALAMAZOOKALAMAZOOPFOS1.4× the federal limit193K
SPRING LAKE TOWNSHIPSPRING LAKEPFOA1.2× the federal limit9.4K
GRAND HAVENGRAND HAVENPFOA1.2× the federal limit10K
FREMONTFREMONTPFOA1.1× the federal limit4.5K
OTSEGO, MIOTSEGOPFOA1.0× the federal limit4.1K
KINROSS TOWNSHIPKINCHELOEPFHxS69% of federal limit5.3K
WATERFORD TOWNSHIPWATERFORDPFHxS65% of federal limit73K
KINGSFORDKINGSFORDPFHxS65% of federal limit5.5K
SOUTH LYON, CITY OFSOUTH LYONHFPO-DA54% of federal limit11K
ANN ARBORANN ARBORPFBABelow detection242K
SCIO TOWNSHIPANN ARBORPFPeABelow detection8.5K
UTICA, CITY OFUTICAPFNABelow federal limit5.1K
PORTAGEPORTAGEPFHxSBelow federal limit46K
PFIZERKALAMAZOOPFHxSBelow federal limit4.0K
CHARLOTTE, CITY OFCHARLOTTEPFHxSBelow federal limit9.1K
ALLEN PARKALLEN PARK6:2FTSBelow detection28K
BATTLE CREEK - VERONA SYSTEMBATTLE CREEKPFPeABelow detection44K
BIRMINGHAMBIRMINGHAMPFBABelow detection20K
BLISSFIELDBLISSFIELDPFBABelow detection3.3K
BUENA VISTA TOWNSHIPSAGINAWPFBABelow detection8.7K
EAST BAY CHARTER TOWNSHIPTRAVERSE CITYPFBSBelow detection3.7K
FENTON, CITY OFFENTONPFPeABelow detection12K
FRENCHTOWN TOWNSHIPMONROEPFBABelow detection16K
GAYLORD, CITY OFGAYLORDPFHxABelow detection3.6K
GREENVILLEGREENVILLEPFBSBelow detection8.8K
HESPERIAHESPERIAPFBSBelow detection954
LAKE BELLA VISTAROCKFORDPFBSBelow detection3.6K
MIDDLEVILLEMIDDLEVILLEPFBSBelow detection3.3K
MIDLAND, CITY OFMIDLANDPFBABelow detection43K
MOUNT CLEMENS, CITY OFMT CLEMENSPFBABelow detection16K
OAK PARK, MIOAK PARKPFBABelow detection30K
PLAINFIELD TOWNSHIPGRAND RAPIDSPFBABelow detection42K
PONTIACWATERFORDPFBABelow detection64K
AUBURN HILLSAUBURN HILLSPFBABelow detection21K
ROSEVILLE, CITY OFROSEVILLE6:2FTSBelow detection47K
SAGINAW, CITY OFSAGINAWPFBABelow detection44K
SPRINGFIELDSPRINGFIELDPFPeABelow detection3.8K
SUPERIOR TOWNSHIPYPSILANTIPFPeABelow detection6.8K
THREE RIVERSTHREE RIVERSPFBABelow detection7.9K
UNION TOWNSHIPMT PLEASANTPFBSBelow detection13K
WHITE LAKE TOWNSHIPWHITE LAKEPFPeABelow detection5.8K
ADA TOWNSHIPADA-Below detection7.1K
ADRIANADRIAN-Below detection24K
ALBIONALBION-Below detection9.1K
ALGONAC, CITY OFALGONAC-Below detection4.1K
ALLEGANALLEGAN-Below detection5.9K
ALLENDALE TOWNSHIPALLENDALE-Below detection20K

More on PFAS in Michigan

Check your water system

Enter your zip code to see the PFAS results for the water system that serves your home.

Where this data comes from

  • EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, 5th cycle (UCMR 5)
  • Testing period: 2023 to 2026
  • Federal limits: EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels finalized April 2024
  • Read the full methodology