PFAS Testing Results
Vermont
PFAS testing results for 38 water systems serving 300,409 residents.
1 system exceeds federal PFAS limits, affecting 378 residents.
Systems tested
38
7.9% had PFAS detections
Limits exceeded
1
2.6% of systems
Population affected
378
served by systems over federal limits
Most common compound
11Cl-PF3OUdS
detected in 3 systems
Grade distribution
Every water system gets a letter grade based on how its worst detected PFAS compound compares to the federal Maximum Contaminant Level. Lower grades mean higher contamination.
Communities exceeding federal limits
The water systems in Vermont where at least one PFAS compound exceeds the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level, sorted worst first.
| System name | City | Grade | Worst compound | Times over limit | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BERLIN HEALTH REHABILITATION CTR | BARRE | D | PFOS | 1.1x | 378 |
Resources for taking action are available in our community toolkit.
What Vermont is doing about PFAS
Vermont has been a national leader on PFAS policy. The state response began with the 2016 discovery of extensive PFOA contamination in Bennington and North Bennington from the former ChemFab facility and its successor Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics. Testing revealed PFOA levels in some private wells as high as 2,880 parts per trillion and a plume that continues to spread. Saint-Gobain signed a settlement agreement with the state to extend municipal water to hundreds of affected households.
In 2019 the Vermont legislature passed Act 21, directing the Agency of Natural Resources to adopt an enforceable drinking water MCL for PFAS. The resulting rule set a combined MCL of 20 parts per trillion for five PFAS compounds, including PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFHpA, and PFNA. Vermont was among the first states to regulate multiple PFAS as a group with a combined threshold.
The Vermont legislature has passed additional product-level laws including S.20, which bans PFAS in food packaging, carpets, fabric treatments, ski wax, and menstrual products, with staggered effective dates. Firefighter protection laws have also restricted Class B foam. The state has an active PFAS advisory committee that makes policy recommendations to lawmakers.
Litigation has been ongoing. The Vermont Attorney General has joined multistate actions against 3M and DuPont, and Vermont residents have pursued separate claims. Public water systems in Vermont are subject to both the state combined MCL and the federal compliance timeline requiring initial monitoring by 2027 and treatment installation by 2029.
Based on Vermont Agency of Natural Resources publications and Vermont legislative records.
All 38 tested water systems in Vermont
Sorted from lowest grade to highest. Click any system name for the full report. Filter by city or name with the search box below.
Showing 38 of 38 systems
| Grade | System name | City | Worst compound | vs. EPA limit | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D | BERLIN HEALTH REHABILITATION CTR | BARRE | PFOS | 1.1× the federal limit | 378 |
B | COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT 2 | COLCHESTER | PFBA | Below detection | 8.3K |
B | SPRINGFIELD WATER DEPT | SPRINGFIELD | PFBS | Below detection | 9.8K |
A | TRI TOWN WATER DISTRICT | BRIDPORT | - | Below detection | 3.8K |
A | MIDDLEBURY WATER DEPT | MIDDLEBURY | - | Below detection | 9.4K |
A | VERGENNES PANTON WATER DISTRICT | SHOREHAM | - | Below detection | 5.1K |
A | BENNINGTON WATER DEPT | BENNINGTON | - | Below detection | 13K |
A | NORTH BENNINGTON WATER DEPT | BENNINGTON | - | Below detection | 1.7K |
A | MANCHESTER WATER DEPT | MANCHESTER CENTER | - | Below detection | 4.1K |
A | BROMLEY WATER COMPANY | MANCHESTER CENTER | - | Below detection | 4.3K |
A | LYNDONVILLE WATER SYSTEM | LYNDONVILLE | - | Below detection | 4.0K |
A | ST JOHNSBURY WATER SYSTEM | ST JOHNSBURY | - | Below detection | 5.0K |
A | BURLINGTON DEPT PUBLIC WORKS WATER DIV | BURLINGTON | - | Below detection | 42K |
A | COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT 3 | MILTON | - | Below detection | 7.7K |
A | ESSEX TOWN WATER SYSTEM | ESSEX JUNCTION | - | Below detection | 9.7K |
A | ESSEX JCT WATER DEPT | ESSEX JUNCTION | - | Below detection | 9.5K |
A | MILTON WATER DEPT | MILTON | - | Below detection | 8.0K |
A | RICHMOND WATER DEPT | RICHMOND | - | Below detection | 1.0K |
A | SHELBURNE WATER DEPT | SHELBURNE | - | Below detection | 5.8K |
A | SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY WATER SYSTEM | SOUTH BURLINGTON | - | Below detection | 20K |
A | WILLISTON WATER DEPT | WILLISTON | - | Below detection | 7.3K |
A | WINOOSKI WATER DEPT | WINOOSKI | - | Below detection | 8.5K |
A | ST ALBANS WATER DEPT | ST ALBANS | - | Below detection | 10K |
A | MORRISVILLE WATER AND LIGHT | MORRISVILLE | - | Below detection | 2.9K |
A | NEWPORT CITY WATER SYSTEM | NEWPORT | - | Below detection | 4.8K |
A | BRANDON FIRE DISTRICT 1 | BRANDON | - | Below detection | 4.0K |
A | RUTLAND CITY WATER DEPT | PROCTOR | - | Below detection | 19K |
A | BARRE CITY WATER SYSTEM | BARRE | - | Below detection | 14K |
A | MONTPELIER WATER SYSTEM | MONTPELIER | - | Below detection | 8.9K |
A | NORTHFIELD WATER DEPT | NORTHFIELD | - | Below detection | 5.1K |
A | EDWARD FARRAR UTILITY DISTRICT | WATERBURY | - | Below detection | 6.0K |
A | BRATTLEBORO WATER DEPT | BRATTLEBORO | - | Below detection | 12K |
A | BELLOWS FALLS WATER DEPT | BELLOWS FALLS | - | Below detection | 4.0K |
A | WINHALL STRATTON F D 1 | STRATTON MOUNTAIN | - | Below detection | 6.2K |
A | HARTFORD WATER DEPT | WHITE RIVER JCT | - | Below detection | 7.6K |
A | JAY PEAK WATER SYSTEM | JAY | - | Below detection | 6.7K |
A | MILL RIVER USD 40 | CLARENDON | - | Below detection | 1.0K |
A | NE WASTE SERVICES | MONTPELIER | - | Below detection | 60 |
More on PFAS in Vermont
City profiles
Check your water system
Enter your zip code to see the PFAS results for the water system that serves your home.
Where this data comes from
- EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, 5th cycle (UCMR 5)
- Testing period: 2023 to 2026
- Federal limits: EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels finalized April 2024
- Read the full methodology